Everything about Exact Form totally explained
In
mathematics, especially
vector calculus and
differential topology, a
closed form is a
differential form α whose differential is zero (
dα = 0), and an
exact form is a differential form that's the differential of another differential form (
α =
dβ for some differential form
β, known as a
primitive for
α).
Since
d2 = 0, to be exact is a
sufficient condition to be closed. The main interest of this pair of definitions, thus, is that asking whether this is also a
necessary condition is a way of detecting
topological information, by differential conditions. It makes no real sense to ask whether a 0-form is exact, since
d increases degree by 1.
When the difference of two closed forms is an exact form, they're said to be
cohomologous to each other. That is, if ζ and η are closed forms, and one can find some β such that
»
then one says that ζ and η are cohomologous to each other. Exact forms are sometimes said to be
cohomologous to zero. The set of all forms cohomologous to each other form an element of a
de Rham cohomology class; the general study of such classes is known as
cohomology.
The cases of differential forms in
R2 and
R3 were already well-known in the mathematical
physics of the nineteenth century. In the plane, 0-forms are just functions, and 2-forms are functions times the basic area element
dx∧
dy, so that it's the 1-forms
»
that are of real interest. The formula for the
exterior derivative d here is
»
where the subscripts denote
partial derivatives. Therefore the condition for
α to be
closed is
»
In this case if
h(
x,
y) is a function then
»
The implication from 'exact' to 'closed' is then a consequence of the
symmetry of second derivatives, with respect to
x and
y.
Poincaré lemma
The
Poincaré lemma states that if
X is a
contractible open subset of
Rn, any smooth closed
p-form
α defined on
X is exact, for any integer
p > 0 (this has content only when
p ≤
n).
Contractability means that there's a
homotopy Ft :
X×[0,1] →
X that continuously deforms
X to a point. Thus every cycle
c in
X is the boundary of some "cone"; one may take the cone to be the image of
c under the homotopy. A dual version of this gives Poincaré lemma.
More specificly, we associate to
X the cylinder
X×[0,1]. Identify the top and bottom of the cylinder with the maps
j1(
x) = (
x, 1) and
j0(
x) = (
x, 0) respectively. On the differential forms, the induced maps
j1* and
j0* are related by a
cochain homotopy K:
»
Let Ω
p(
X) denote the
p-forms on
X. The map
K: Ω
p + 1(
X×[0,1] ) → Ω
p(
X) is the dual of the cylinder map and defined by
»
where
dxp is a monomial
p-form with no
dt in it. So if
F is a homotopy deforming
X to a point
Q, then
»
On forms,
»
Inserting these two equations into the cochain homotopy equation proves Poincaré lemma.
A corollary of the lemma is that
de Rham cohomology is homotopy invariant.
Non-contractible spaces need not have trivial de Rham cohomology. For instance, on the circle
S1, parametrized by
t in [0,1], the closed 1-form
dt isn't exact.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Exact Form'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://closed_and_exact_differential_forms.totallyexplained.com">Closed and exact differential forms Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |